Quality of Hire: Meaning, Formula & Free Calculator [2026]

What is Quality of Hire?

Quality of hire (QoH) is a recruiting metric that measures the value a new employee brings to an organization relative to the investment made in hiring them. Unlike speed or cost metrics that measure recruiting efficiency, quality of hire measures recruiting effectiveness — did the person we hired actually turn out to be a good hire?

LinkedIn's Global Talent Trends report consistently ranks quality of hire as the most important recruiting metric — yet 75% of companies struggle to measure it systematically. The reason is that QoH requires input from performance management, not just recruiting, making it cross-functional by design.

Quality of Hire Formula

The most widely used quality of hire formula averages the key post-hire performance indicators:

LinkedIn's own version uses: Performance review score + Ramp time to full productivity + Retention (is the person still there at 12 months?) — averaged together as percentages out of 100.

There is no single universal formula. What matters is that you define your indicators upfront, collect data consistently, and compare QoH scores across cohorts (hiring manager, recruiter, source channel, time period).

What to Include in Quality of Hire Measurement

Core indicators (include all 3)

• Performance score at 90 days or first review: The most direct signal. Use your company's performance rating system (1–5 scale, percentile ranking, or meets/exceeds). Normalize to 0–100 for the formula.
• Hiring manager satisfaction at 90 days: A structured 1–10 survey asking: "How satisfied are you with this hire's performance and fit?" Convert to 0–100. HM surveys capture signals that formal performance reviews miss in the first 6 months.
• Retention at 12 months: Did the person stay for 12 months? Score as 100 (stayed) or 0 (left voluntarily within 12 months). Involuntary departures due to layoffs should be excluded from this calculation.

Optional indicators (add if your company tracks them)

• Ramp speed: Time to full productivity divided by target ramp time. Express as a percentage (faster than expected = 100+).
• Cultural fit / values alignment: Peer survey or HM assessment at 60 days.
• Technical competency score: Based on first performance review or technical assessment post-hire.

Quality of Hire Scores: What Do They Mean?

What is a good quality of hire score?

A QoH score of 75 or above (across all indicators) represents a good hire. Most high-performing recruiting organizations target a cohort average of 70–80 — acknowledging that some hires will underperform despite a rigorous process, while focusing on eliminating the bottom tail (scores under 50).

The more valuable use of QoH scores is comparing across dimensions: recruiter (who produces the highest quality cohorts?), source channel (do employee referrals produce higher QoH than job boards?), and interview type (do structured interviews predict QoH better than unstructured?)

How to Improve Quality of Hire

1. Use structured, criteria-based interviews. Unstructured interviews predict job performance at a rate barely above chance (0.38 correlation). Structured interviews using a standardized scorecard increase predictive validity to 0.51+. This is the single highest-leverage change most recruiting teams can make.
2. Align on the success profile before posting the role. QoH starts with a clear definition of what "good" looks like for this specific role, team, and stage. Generic job descriptions produce generic candidate pools. Work-sample-based success profiles produce better interview conversations and better hiring decisions.
3. Track QoH by recruiter and source channel. Aggregated QoH tells you how your team is doing overall. Segmented QoH tells you which recruiters, sourcing strategies, and assessment approaches actually predict performance. This data drives process improvement.
4. Close the feedback loop between hiring and performance. Most recruiting teams never learn how their hires actually performed. Set up a recurring 90-day check-in with hiring managers to collect QoH data, and share aggregated results with the recruiting team quarterly.
5. Weight technical assessment more heavily for technical roles. For engineering roles, domain-specific technical assessments are the strongest predictor of on-the-job performance. Behavioral interviews alone miss the competence signal that correlates with quality of hire in technical roles.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related HR Calculators